| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Steve Thomas
   |
Posted - 2009.02.25 01:16:00 -
[1]
well the rate they are going with T3 im expecting to see modules that will have a "fair market value" > 1 billion (each) at 4 and god only knows at 5.
I hope im wrong.
*.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.*
Stop freaking worrying about why things the developerd did 5 years and more ago no longer make sence. |
Steve Thomas
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 02:13:00 -
[2]
next to none.
Seriously the best industrialists in the game are openly saying they are not worth the effort needed to get the materials out of Wspace as it is rignt now.
Right now theirs not that many ships that can get the base mats needed(unless they intend to fix hulks or come out with a Gas mining barge that has the needed tank, drone bay, and resists)
none of thoes ships are optimised for gas harvesting
the security needed to keep gas harvesting ships alive vs Sleeper rats currently is idiotic.
oh and by the way the wormhole may not even let the ships you need for a proper op in the first place + the risk of you loseing your ship and all aquired loot because your hole imploded on you and opend half way accros the bloody map in hostile space is high.
but somehow they expect to fix all of that in the next 2 weeks. . .
I think we need to investigate whats in the beer they are drinking.
*.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.*
Stop freaking worrying about why things the developerd did 5 years and more ago no longer make sence. |
Steve Thomas
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 02:26:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Rawr Cristina
There's 3 on the market but 5 do exist (on SiSi), it could be that the final 2 are very rare or hard to build or something.
they are not buildable on sisi. period. they currently are little more than placeholders for when they get to developing them. kind of like the Orca was for a long time.
*.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.*
Stop freaking worrying about why things the developerd did 5 years and more ago no longer make sence. |
Steve Thomas
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 02:33:00 -
[4]
Lets be realistic.
90% of the player base dont give a crap so long as it dosent interup what they are doing.
of that probably half will poke there nose into Wspace to see whats up.
odds are that half of them will like it enough to keep doing it.
and frankly if they are haveing fun doing it then the devs got something right.
*.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.*
Stop freaking worrying about why things the developerd did 5 years and more ago no longer make sence. |
Steve Thomas
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 19:30:00 -
[5]
Originally by: CCP t0rfifrans
Military experts are calling this an epic maths fail on my behalf. You are right. However, the fourth variation has been mostl designed and almost made it into M10, so getting it in is a matter of 3-9 weeks after M10.
* The time the fifth variation will be launched is dependant on the interest and pick-up of T3 ships. **Would I have liked to have all five at M10? Of course? But considering the life time of assets in EVE, I want what goes in there to be polished and smooth rather than rushed so the decision was taken to focus on the three and make them ***awesome, which they certainly are.
Translation
* Wether or not we actualy waste resorces on T3 depends on how badly T3 bombs or how well it succeeds
**We should have stuck to the usual release dates and not pushed it to may 10 just to get a whoopeee! at fan fest.
***hey at least I did not use devspeak terms like Epic or Revolutionary
well at least now you guys know better.
*.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.* *.*
Stop freaking worrying about why things the developerd did 5 years and more ago no longer make sence. |
| |
|